°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > Àú³Î > »ó¼¼

´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ|´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 6¿ù

±â»ç¸í ¹®È­°ü±¤ÁöÀÇ ¹®È­Á¤Ä¡¿Í Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀÇ »çȸÀû ±¸¼º / Cultural Politics and Social Construction of Cultural Tourist Destinations : Reinterpretation, Institutionalization and Recognition of Otaru in Japan / ÀϺ» ȪīÀ̵µ ¿ÀŸ·çÀÇ ÀçÇؼ®, Á¦µµÈ­, ÀçÀνÄ
ÀúÀÚ¸í Á¶¾Æ¶ó
¹ßÇà»ç ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö , v.44 n.3(2009-06)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(240) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(20)
ISSN 1225-6633
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ¹®È­°ü±¤ ; ¿ª»ç°æ°ü ; ¹®È­»ê¾÷ ; Áö¿ªÀÇ »çȸÀû ±¸¼º ; Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀÇ Á¤Ä¡ ; ±â¾ïÀÇ Á¤Ä¡ ; cultural tourism ; historical landscape ; cultural industry ; social construction of region ; politics of identity ; politics of memory
¿ä¾à1 ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â ÀϺ»»çȸÀû ¸Æ¶ô ¼Ó¿¡¼­ Áö¹æµµ½Ã°¡ °ü±¤À» ÅëÇØ »õ·Ó°Ô âÁ¶µÊÀ» ¹àÈ÷°í, Áö¿ªÀÇ Àǹ̰¡ »çȸÀûÀ¸·Î Çü¼ºµÇ´Â °úÁ¤À» °íÂûÇÔÀ¸·Î½á, ¹®È­°ü±¤ÁöÀÇ Áö¿ªÁ¤Ã¼¼ºÀÌ »çȸÀûÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÇ´Â ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¸¦ ¹àÈ÷´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀ¸·Î, ù°, ¹®È­°ü±¤ÁöÀÇ»çȸÀû±¸¼º¿¡´ëÇÑ°³³äƲÀ»¡®ÀçÇؼ®¡¯,¡® Á¦µµÈ­¡¯,¡® ÀçÀνġ¯´Ü°è·ÎÁ¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÑ°, ÀϺ»Áö¹æµµ½Ã¿ÀŸ·çÀÇ¿îÇϺ¸Á¸¿îµ¿°ú ¿ª»ç°ü±¤ÁöÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç·Ê ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¹®È­°ü±¤ÁöÀÇ »çȸÀû ±¸¼º °úÁ¤ ´Ü°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÃþÀû ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃµµÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Â°, Áö¿ª Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀÌ À籸¼ºµÇ´Â °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ÀÛµ¿ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ÁÖµÈ ¸ÞÄ¿´ÏÁò¿¡ ´ëÇØ Ã¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î °íÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î, Áö¿ªÀÌ Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀÇ Á¤Ä¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ »õ·Ó°Ô ÀçÇؼ®µÇ¸ç, °æÁ¦Àû µ¿±â·Î ÀÎÇØ ±× Àǹ̰¡ ¼öÁ¤µÇ°í ŸÇùµÇ¸ç Á¦µµÈ­µÈ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¹àÈ÷°í, ±â¾ïÀÇ Á¤Ä¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±¸¼ºµÈ ÁøÁ¤¼ºÀ¸·Î È®¸³µÇ¸é¼­ ²÷ÀÓ¾øÀÌ À籸¼ºµÈ´Ù´Â Á¡À» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 This study aimed to reveal that a local city was recreated by tourism, and to discover a general process in which the regional identity as a tourist destination was reconstructed. Specifically, firstly, this study suggested that the social construction of cultural tourist destinations was composed of a series of dynamic stages such as ¡®reinterpretation¡¯, ¡®institutionalization¡¯, and ¡®recognition¡¯ conceptually. Secondly, the dynamic stages were analyzed on the ethnographic study of Otaru where the movement of preservation of the historical canal was raised and strategies to attract tourism had been implemented. Thirdly, a main mechanism acting on each stage was examined. In conclusion, it was shown that the region was reinterpreted through the politics of identity and the meaning was institutionalized through political and economic negotiation. Moreover, while being established as a constructed authenticity by politics of memory, the regional identity was embedded in the socio-spatial consciousness constantly.
¼ÒÀåó ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
ºÐ¼®¼­Áö
µµ½Ã°èȹ > µµ½Ã°èȹÀÏ¹Ý > ÀÌ·Ð

ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ÀÏ¹Ý »çȸÀû ¸Æ¶ô ¼Ó¿¡¼­ ¡®Áö¹æµµ½Ã¡¯°¡ °ü±¤À» ÅëÇØ »õ·Ó°Ô âÁ¶µÊÀ» ¹àÈ÷°í, Áö¿ªÀÇ Àǹ̰¡ »çȸÀûÀ¸·Î Çü¼ºµÇ´Â °úÁ¤À» °íÂûÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¹®È­°ü±¤ÁöÀÇ Áö¿ªÁ¤Ã¼¼ºÀÌ »çȸÀûÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÇ´Â ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¸¦ ¹àÈ÷´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ ÀϺ» ¿ÀŸ·çÀÇ ¿îÇϺ¸Á¸¿îµ¿°ú ¿ª»ç°ü±¤ÁöÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç·Ê ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¹®È­°ü±¤ÁöÀÇ »çȸÀû ±¸¼º °úÁ¤ ´Ü°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÃþÀûÀÎ ºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á·ÐÀ¸·Î, Áö¿ªÀÌ Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀÇ Á¤Ä¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ »õ·Ó°Ô ÀçÇؼ®µÇ¸ç, °æÁ¦Àû µ¿±â·Î ÀÎÇØ ±× Àǹ̰¡ ¼öÁ¤µÇ°í ŸÇùµÇ¸ç Á¦µµÈ­µÈ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¹àÈ÷°í, ±â¾ïÀÇ Á¤Ä¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±¸¼ºµÈ ÁøÁ¤¼ºÀ¸·Î È®¸³µÇ¸é¼­ ²÷ÀÓ¾øÀÌ À籸¼ºµÈ´Ù´Â Á¡À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.