°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > Àú³Î > »ó¼¼

´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ|´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 6¿ù

±â»ç¸í ¼­¿ï½Ã ´ëÁß±³Åëü°è °³Æí ÀÌÈÄ Åë±Ù ±³Åë¼ö´Ü ¼±ÅÃÀÇ Â÷º°Àû º¯È­ / Differential Changes in Commuter¡¯s Mode Choice after the Intergrated Public Transit System in Seoul Metropolitan City
ÀúÀÚ¸í ÀÌÇý½Â ; ÀÌÈñ¿¬
¹ßÇà»ç ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö , v.44 n.3(2009-06)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(323) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(16)
ISSN 1225-6633
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ÅëÇà¸ñÀû ; ÅëÇà¼ö´Ü¼±Åà ; Á¶°ÇºÎ ·ÎÁþ¸ðÇü ; ÇÑ°èÈ¿°ú ; trip purpose ; mode choice ; conditional logit model ; marginal effect
¿ä¾à1 º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼­¿ï½ÃÀÇ ´ëÁß±³Åëü°è °³Æí¿¡ µû¸¥ Åë±Ù½Ã¿¡ ±³Åë¼ö´Ü¼±ÅÃÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϴµ¥ ¸ñÀûÀ» µÎ¾ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷ °³ÀÎÀÇ »çȸ¡¤°æÁ¦Àû Ư¼º, ÅëÇà¸ñÀû, Ãâ¹ßÁö¿Í µµÂøÁöÀÇ °ø°£Àû Ư¼º¿¡ µû¶ó µÎ ½ÃÁ¡µ¿¾È Åë±Ù ±³Åë¼ö´Ü¼±ÅÃÀÇ º¯È­°¡ ¾î¶»°Ô Â÷º°È­µÇ¾î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Â°¡¸¦ ÆľÇÇϴµ¥ ÃÊÁ¡À» µÎ¾ú´Ù. Á¶°ÇºÎ ·ÎÁþ¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÅëÇà¼ö´Ü¼±Åÿ¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °áÁ¤¿äÀεéÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯È­µÇ¾ú´Â°¡¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ƯÁ¤ ÅëÇà¼ö´Ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëü ÅëÇà¼ö´ÜÀÇ ÇÑ°èÈ¿°úµµ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú Àú¼Òµæ°èÃþÀϼö·Ï ÁöÇÏö ¼±ÅÃÈ®·üÀÌ °¡Àå Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, µµÂøÁö¿¡¼­ÀÇ ´ëÁß±³Åë Á¢±Ùµµ¿Í ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ô°í È¥ÇÕ¿ëµµ ºñÀ²ÀÌ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ´ëÁß±³ÅëÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ´Â È®·üÀÌ ´õ ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Åë±Ù ½Ã ÅëÇà¼ö´Ü°£ÀÇ ´ëü ÇÑ°èÈ¿°ú¸¦ º¸¸é ÀÚ°¡¿ë ½Â¿ëÂ÷¿Í ÁöÇÏö°£ÀÇ ´ëüȮ·üÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú ¼­¿ï½Ã ´ëÁß±³Åëü°è °³ÆíÀÌ ±³Åë¼ö´Ü¼±ÅÃÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ ¹ÌÄ£ ¿µÇâ·ÂÀº »ó´çÈ÷ Â÷º°ÀûÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖÀ½À» ½Ã»çÇØÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 This study analyzes the changes in commuter¡¯s mode choice between 2002 and 2006 according to the implement of the integrated public transit system in Seoul metropolitan city. Especially this study focuses on differential changes in a transit modal choice among socioeconomic status, trip purpose and spatial characteristics of origin and destination. The probability of public transit use against automobile is modeled as a function of socioeconomic variables, spatial characteristics of origin and destination and the utility of the commuter¡¯s mode. The results from conditional logit model analyses suggest that people with lower income show the larger changes in the ratio of public transit choice between 2002-06. Also both higher density, more accessible to public transit and more diverse land uses in residence zone and in work place generally increase the ratio of public transit choice between 2002-06. Car and subway have the most strong alternative relation in commuter¡¯s mode choice. The findings give an important implication that the integrated public transit system has differential impacts on commuter¡¯s mode choice in Seoul.
¼ÒÀåó ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
ºÐ¼®¼­Áö
±³Å롤ȯ°æ¡¤GIS > ±³Åë°èȹ > ±³Åë°èȹÀϹÝ

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¼­¿ï½ÃÀÇ ´ëÁß±³Åëü°è °³Æí¿¡ µû¸¥ Åë±Ù½Ã¿¡ ±³Åë¼ö´Ü¼±ÅÃÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Á¶°ÇºÎ ·ÎÁþ¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÅëÇà¼ö´Ü¼±Åÿ¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °áÁ¤¿äÀεéÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯È­µÇ¾ú´Â°¡¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ƯÁ¤ ÅëÇà¼ö´Ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëü ÅëÇà¼ö´ÜÀÇ ÇÑ°èÈ¿°úµµ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, Àú¼Òµæ°èÃþÀϼö·Ï ÁöÇÏö ¼±ÅÃÈ®·üÀÌ °¡Àå Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, µµÂøÁö¿¡¼­ÀÇ ´ëÁß±³Åë Á¢±Ùµµ¿Í ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ô°í È¥ÇÕ¿ëµµ ºñÀ²ÀÌ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ´ëÁß±³ÅëÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ´Â È®·üÀÌ ´õ ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.