°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > Àú³Î > »ó¼¼

´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ|´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 8¿ù

±â»ç¸í È¿°úÀûÀÎ Áö¸® ±³¼ö¡¤ÇнÀÀ» À§ÇÑ À¯ÃßÀÇ ÀÌÇØ¿Í È°¿ë / The Use of Analogy in Teaching and Learning Geography
ÀúÀÚ¸í ÀÌÁ¾¿ø ; Ç԰渲
¹ßÇà»ç ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö , v.46 n.4(2011-08)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(534) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(20)
ISSN 1225-6633
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î À¯Ãß ; ÀüÀÌ ; À¯ÃßÀüÀÌ ; °ø°£Àû À¯Ãß ; µµ½Ä ; Ç¥»óÀüÀÌ ; analogy ; transfer ; analogical transfer ; spatial analogy ; schema ; representational transfer
¿ä¾à1 À¯Ãß´Â Àͼ÷ÇÑ ¹®Á¦(¹ÙÅÁ¹®Á¦)ÀÇ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ýÀ» È°¿ëÇÏ¿© À¯»çÇÑ ¹®Á¦(Ç¥Àû¹®Á¦)¸¦ ÇØ°áÇÏ´Â ¹®Á¦ÇØ°á Àü·«ÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº À¯ÃßÀû »ç°íÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ Áö¸®Àû ¹®Á¦»óȲÀ» »õ·Ó°Ô ÀνÄÇÏ°í, ³ª¾Æ°¡ Áö¿ªÇнÀ, ±×·¡ÇÈÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ¹®Á¦ÇØ°á, »ç·ÊÇнÀÀ» ÅëÇÑ °³³ä/±â´É ½Àµæ¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÑ ±³¼ö¡¤ÇнÀ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ À¯ÃßÀÇ Àǹ̸¦ ÆľÇÇÏ°í, À¯Ãß °ü·Ã À̷еéÀ» ÅëÇØ À¯ÃßÀÇ ¹ß»ý¸ÅÄ¿´ÏÁò°ú ¼º°øÀûÀÎ À¯ÃßÀû ¹®Á¦ÇØ°áÀÇ Á¶°ÇÀ» ³íÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ¿¬±¸ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, °ø°£Àû À¯Ãß ¾ÆÀ̵ð¾î´Â Áö¿ªÇнÀÀ» Á¶Á÷ÇÏ´Â À¯¿ëÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ƯÈ÷, Áö¸®Àû ³»¿ëÁö½Ä°ú ½Ã¡¤°ø°£Àû »ç°í¸¦ µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Â °ø°£Àû À¯Ãß´Â ¿µ¿ªÆ¯¼öÀû ¹®Á¦ÇØ°á Àü·«À¸·Î¼­ °¡´É¼ºÀ» °®°í ÀÖ´Ù. µÑ°, ±×·¡ÇÈÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ¹®Á¦ÇØ°áÀÇ ÀüÀ̸¦ ÀǹÌÇϴ ǥ»óÀüÀÌ´Â Á¤º¸ÀÇ ½Ã°¢È­, °ø°£È­¸¦ ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÏ´Â Áö¸®Àû ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϴµ¥ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÑ´Ù. ¼Â°, Ç¥¸éÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ´Ù¸£Áö¸¸ °øÅëÀÇ ³»Àû±¸Á¶¸¦ °®´Â À¯»çÇÑ »ç·ÊµéÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÑ ÈÄ ºñ±³¡¤ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°Ô Çϰųª, °¡±³ ¿ªÇÒÀÇ »ç·Ê¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀº Áö¸®Àû °³³ä, ±â´ÉÀÇ ½Àµæ¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÏ´Ù. °á·Ð¿¡¼­´Â À¯Ãß °ü·Ã Áö¸®±³À° ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ¿¬±¸ ÁÖÁ¦¿Í ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ °®´Â Á߿伺À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 Analogical thinking is a problem-solving strategy to use a familiar problem (or base analog) to solve a novel problem of the same type (the target problem). The purpose of this study is to provide new insight into geography teaching and learning by connecting cognitive science research on analogical thinking with issues of geography education and suggest that teaching with analogies can be a productive instructional strategy for geography. In this study, using the various examples of analogical thinking used in geography we defined analogical thinking, addressed the theoretical models on analogical transfer, and discussed conditions that make an effective analogical transfer. The major research findings include the following: a) the spatial analogy, indicating skills to find places that may be far apart but have similar locations, and therefore have other similar conditions and/or connections, can provide a useful way to design contents for place learning; b) representational transfer, specifying a common representation for two problems, can play a key role in solving geographic problems requiring data visualization and spatialization processes; and c) either asking learners to compare/analyze similar examples sharing common structure or providing them examples bridging the gap between concrete, real-life phenomena and the abstract ideas and models can contribute to learning in geographic concepts and skills. The spatial analogy requiring both geographic content knowledge and visual/spatial thinking has the potential to become a content-specific problem-solving strategy. We ended with recommendations for future research on analogy that is important in geography education.
¼ÒÀåó ´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î