¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö , v.46 n.4(2011-08) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°ü°èÀû »ç°í ; Áö¸®Àû Áö½Ä ; »óÇ° ; »óÇ° ¹°½ÅÁÖÀÇ ; Çܹö°Å Ä¿³Ø¼Ç ; À±¸® ; relational thinking ; geographical knowledge ; commodity ; commodtity fetishism ; hamburger connection ; ethics |
¿ä¾à1 |
¼Òºñ ÀÚº»ÁÖÀÇ´Â »óÇ° ¹°½ÅÈ Àü·«À» ÅëÇØ »óÇ°¿¡ ³»ÀçµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÀçÀûÀÎ Áö¸®Àû Áö½ÄÀ» »ó»óÀûÀÎ Áö¸®Àû Áö½ÄÀ¸·Î ´ëü½ÃÄÑ ³ª°£´Ù. ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ Çö´ëÀÇ ¼ÒºñÀÚ ¼¼°è ¼Ó¿¡¼ ÇлýµéÀº »óÇ°ÀÇ ½ÇÀç ¼¼°è¿Í ´ÜÀýµÇ°í »óÇ°ÀÌ °¡Áö´Â Áö¸®Àû »îÀ» ¸Á°¢ÇÏ°Ô µÊÀ¸·Î½á °á±¹ ÀڽŰú »óÇ°À» °ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î »ç°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´É·ÂÀÌ ¾àȵǰí ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¡¼ ÇлýµéÀº »óÇ°ÀÇ ±Û·Î¹ú ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ¼Ó¿¡¼ ÀÚ½ÅÀÌ °¡Áö´Â À§Ä¡ÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì¿Í ÀڽŰú »óÇ° ³×Æ®¿öÅ© »çÀÌÀÇ »óÈ£ °ü°è¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â ȯ°æ ¹®Á¦¸¦ À±¸®ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦ Àǽİú Çö½Ç »óȲ ¼Ó¿¡¼ º» ¿¬±¸´Â Çܹö°Å Ä¿³Ø¼ÇÀ» »ç·Ê·Î »óÇ° ¼Òºñ¿Í À±¸®ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ »ìÆ캸¸é¼ Çлýµé·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý °ü°èÀû »ç°í¸¦ ÅëÇØ »óÇ°°ú Çлý ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¹Ù¶óº¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¾È¸ñÀ» °¡Áú ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áö¸® ±³À°ÀÇ ¿ªÇÒÀÓÀ» ÁÖÀåÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
Consumer capitalism is transforming real geographical knowledge into imaginary one through commodity fetishism. As a result, students' ability to think themselves and commodity relationally become weak. Thus, the students cannot recognize the positional meanings of themselves in the global networks of food and ethically perceive environmental issues that generate due to the interrelation between the students and the commodity networks. In these problematic consciousness and situations, this research examine relation of commodity consumption and ethics through hamburger connection and insists that geographical education helps the students acquire insight into the relationship between food and themselves through relational thinking |