¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇÑÁö¸®ÇÐȸÁö , v.48 n.1(2013-02) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ÁöÇüÇÐÀû »êÁö ; ±¹Áö±âº¹·® ; »ê¸Æ ; »êÁöºÐÆ÷ ; Â÷¼ö»êÁö ; geomorphological mountain area ; local elevation range ; mountain range ; mountain distribution ; order mountain |
¿ä¾à1 |
Çѱ¹Àº ±¹ÅäÀÇ 70%°¡ »êÁö·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ »ç¶÷µéÀº Çѱ¹À» »ê¾Ç±¹°¡·Î ÀνÄÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀνÄÀº »ê¸²Ã»ÀÇ »êÁö Á¤ÀÇ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ë¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ »ê¸²Ã»ÀÇ »êÁöÁ¤ÀÇ¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé, Àú°íµµ¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ´Â ÀÓ¡¤°æÁöµµ »êÁö¿¡ Æ÷ÇԵȴÙ. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ù°, Kapos et al.(2000)ÀÇ Á¤ÀÇ¿¡ µû¶ó ÁöÇüÇÐÀû »êÁö¸¦ Á¤ÀÇÇÏ°í ÃßÃâÇß´Ù. ±× °á°ú ³²ÇÑ, ºÏÇÑ, Çѹݵµ Àüü¿¡¼ »êÁöÀÇ ºñÀ²Àº °¢°¢ 31%, 51%, 42%ÀÌ´Ù. ±×¸®°í 300~1,000m, 1,000~2500m ±¸°£¿¡¼ »êÁö¿Í ºñ»êÁöÀÇ ºñÀ²Àº °íÀ§Æòź¸é°ú °°Àº °í¿øÀÇ Á¸Àç·Î ÀÎÇØ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀδÙ. µÑ°, GIS¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÁßøºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ ÁöÇüÇÐÀû »êÁöÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ Qui and SON(2010)ÀÌ Á¤ÀÇÇÑ Â÷¼ö»êÁöÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¿Í ºñ±³Çß´Ù. ±× °á°ú °¡Àå ³ôÀº Â÷¼öÀÇ »êÁöÀÎ 5Â÷¼ö »êÁö¿¡¼µµ ±¸¸ª ¹× Æò¾ß, ºñ»êÁö Áö¿ªÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇß´Ù. ÀÌ´Â »ê¸²Ã»ÀÇ »êÁöÁ¤ÀÇ°¡ Çй®Àû, Çö½ÇÀû, ÀνķÐÀû »êÁöÀÇ °³³äÀ̳ª ¹°¸®Àû ¼Ó¼º¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »êÁö¸¦ ºÐ·ùÇϱâ À§ÇØ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ÁöÇüÇÐÀû »êÁö Á¤ÀÇ¿Í´Â ³Ê¹«³ª ´Ù¸£´Ù´Â ÁÖÀåÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ÁöÇüÇÐÀû »êÁöÁ¤ÀÇ´Â ÇâÈÄ »êÁöÀÇ °úÇÐÀûÀÎ °ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ ¹ß´Þ¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
The mountain region in Korea has been known as 70% of total area and most Korean people have recognized Korea as the mountainous country. Those concepts are thought to be mislead by the definition of the Korea Forest Service for the mountain region. According to KFS's definition based on the land-use, the forest and farmland at the low altitude are also included in the mountain region. In this study, firstly, the geomorphological mountain region is extracted according to the definition of Kapos et al. (2000). The rates of mountain region in S. Korea, N. Korea, Korea Peninsular are 31%, 51%, 42% respectively. And the rates between mountain area and non-mountain area in the 300-1000m and 1000-2500m intervals are considerably different due to the existence of plateaus such as high-level plain surfaces. Secondly, using the overlay analysis in GIS, the distribution of mountain areas are compared with that of order-mountains' areas defined by Qui and SON (2010). Even in case of the 5th order, the highest order mountains, the hill & plain and non-mountain areas are included in that mountain area. It is possible to suggest that the definition of the KFS is completely different from the academic, realistic and epistemic definition for mountain area, and the geomorphological definition of mountain area is useful to classify the mountain area according to the its physical properties. Therefore, it would be expected that the definition contributes the development of methodologies on the scientific management of mountain area in future. |