°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

ÅäÁöÁÖÅÿ¬±¸¿ø|LHI Journal 2011³â 10¿ù

³í¹®¸í ÅäÁöÁ¤Ã¥ ÃßÁøÃ¼°è º¯È­ ¿¬±¸ / Analyzing the Implement System Shift of Land Policies
ÀúÀÚ¸í ±è¹Ì¼÷ ; À±Á¤¶õ½Äº°ÀúÀÚ ; ¹Ú»óÇÐ
¹ßÇà»ç ÅäÁöÁÖÅÿ¬±¸¿ø
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× LHI Journal, v.2 n.4 (2011-10)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(439) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(14)
ISSN 2093-8829
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù ½Ã°ø(Àû»ê) / °èȹ¹×¼³°è / ±¸Á¶
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ÃßÁøÃ¼°è ; ÅäÁö¼ÒÀ¯Á¤Ã¥ ; ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ëÁ¤Ã¥ ; ÅäÁö°³¹ßÁ¤Ã¥ ; ÅäÁö°ü¸®Á¤Ã¥ ; Implement Systems ; Land Ownership Policy ; Land Use Policy ; Land Development Policy ; Land Management Policy
¿ä¾à1 º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ëÀ» µÑ·¯½Ñ Á¤Ã¥ ȯ°æº¯È­¿¡ µû¶ó ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ÅäÁöÁ¤Ã¥ ÃßÁøÃ¼°èÀÇ º¯È­°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ½ÃÁ¡¿¡¼­ Áö±Ý±îÁö ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÅäÁöÁ¤Ã¥ÃßÁøÃ¼°è¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϰí ÇâÈÄ ¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ 1960³â´ë ÀÌÈĺÎÅÍ ÃÖ±Ù±îÁö ½Ã´ëº°?À¯Çüº°·Î ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÅäÁöÁ¤Ã¥ÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¶ó ÅäÁöÁ¤Ã¥ÀÇ ÃßÁøÃ¼°è°¡ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯È­ÇÏ¿´´ÂÁö ÃßÀ̸¦ »ìÆìº¸¾Ò´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÅäÁöÁ¤Ã¥ ÃßÁøÃ¼°èÀÇ Æ¯Â¡Àº ù°, 1960³â´ë ÀÌ·¡ ÃÖ±Ù±îÁö ´ë±Ô¸ð ¹× ½Å¼ÓÇÑ °³¹ßÀ» µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î Á¤¸³µÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. µÑ°, °æÁ¦°³¹ßÀÌÈÄ ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ÅäÁöÁ¤Ã¥ ÃßÁøÃ¼°è´Â ¿µ¿ªº°·Î Àü¹®È­¸¦ ÀÌ·ç¾î¿ÔÁö¸¸, °³¹ß°ú º¸ÀüÀÌ Á¶È­¸¦ ÀÌ·ê ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÅëÇÕÀû °ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇÑ Á¶Á÷ü°è´Â ºÎÁ·Çß´Ù. ¼Â°, ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ë°ü·Ã Áß¾ÓÁ¤ºÎÀÇ ±ÇÇÑÀ» Áö¹æ¿¡ ÀÌ¾ç ¹× ÅäÁö°³¹ß¿¡¼­ ¹Î°£ ¹× ÁÖ¹ÎÂü¿©¸¦ È®´ëÇØ¿Ô´Ù. ³Ý°, ÅäÁö¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ Á¤º¸ °ü¸® ¸ñÀûÀÌ Á¶¼¼Â¡¼ö¿¡¼­ Á¡Â÷ ÅäÁö½ÃÀå °ü¸®, °èȹÀû ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ëÀ̶ó´Â Ãø¸éÀ¸·Î °­Á¶Á¡ÀÌ º¯È­µÇ¾î°¡°í Àִµ¥, °èȹÀû ÀÌ¿ë°ú °ü¸®¿¡´Â ºÎÇÕÇÏÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ½Ã»çÁ¡ ¹× ÇâÈÄ ÃßÁøÃ¼°èÀÇ °³Æí ¹æÇâÀº ù°, ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ëÀ» µÑ·¯½Ñ ¿©°Çº¯È­ ¹× ¿Ü±¹ÀÇ »ç·Ê¸¦ º¼ ¶§ ÅäÁö¼ö¿ä°¡ ¾ÈÁ¤È­µÉ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ôÀ¸¹Ç·Î, ´ë±Ô¸ð °³¹ß Áß½ÉÀÇ ÃßÁøÃ¼°è¿¡¼­ Å»ÇÇÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù. µÑ°, ÇâÈÄ Àα¸°¨¼Ò ¹× ±âÈĺ¯È­ µîÀ¸·Î ÅäÁöÀÚ¿øÀÇ È¿À²Àû ÀÌ¿ë ¹× º¸ÀüÀû ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ëÀÌ Áß¿äÇØÁú °ÍÀ̹ǷΠÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÃßÁøÃ¼°è°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ¼Â°, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÁÖüÀÇ Âü¿© È®´ë¿Í ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ³Ý°, ÅäÁöÁ¤º¸°ü¸®¸¦ ÅëÇÕÀû?ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î ±¸ÃàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÃßÁøÃ¼°è Á¤ºñ°¡ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 The goal of this research is to suggest the desirable directions of the land policies implement system based on analysis of existing those of Korea with the paradigm shift of land policies. We classify the land policies into land ownership, land use, land development and land management ones, and then analyze their implement system characteristics. The results are follows : firstly, the land policies implement systems have been set to large scale and rapid development. Secondly, although the systems have been specialized by their areas, the comprehensive manage systems for the harmony between development and conservation are lacking. Thirdly, the parts of the central government powers related to land use has been hand covered to local governments. And the participations of residences private companies have enlarged in the land development. Fourthly, the purposes of the information management on land use have been changed from tax collection into planned land use, but the information management has not met the need of planned land use. This study shows that firstly, the implement system focusing on large development projects might be no longer effective because of high possibility of the property prices stabilization, so moderately small ones must be found. Secondly, the system cope with the climate change and to realize the efficient utility of land is needed. Thirdly, it is necessary to take the actual measures to participate a variety of subjects. Fourthly, the system modification of the land information manage system as land policies infra is also needed to establish integral land policies.
¼ÒÀåó ÅäÁöÁÖÅÿ¬±¸¿ø
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î