³í¹®¸í |
°¡¼³±âÀÚÀç ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ ½ÇÅÂÁ¶»ç ¹× °³¼±¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on the Adjustment of Temporary Equipment and Material Items for Compulsory Safety Certification and Autonomous Safety Confirmation Report |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
Á¤ÁöÇö ; ÀÌÇбâ ; À¯Çöµ¿ ; Á¤¼ºÃá |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸÁöȸ¿¬ÇÕȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.20 n.03 (Åë±Ç85È£) (2018-06) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(89) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°¡¼³±âÀÚÀç ; ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ ; ±Ô°Æ ¹× ±âÁØ ; Ç°¸ñÁ¶Á¤ ; Temporary Equipment and Material ; Compulsory Safety Certification ; Autonomy Safety Confirmation Report ; Adequacy Assessment ; Risk Assessment |
¿ä¾à1 |
¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ ¹× ÀÚÀ²¾ÈÀüÈ®ÀÎÀÇ ½Å°í Á¦µµ¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© °¡¼³±âÀÚÀç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» È®º¸Çϵµ·Ï µÇ¾î ÀÖÀ¸³ª °ü·Ã ±âÁØÀÇ Çü½Ä°ú ´Ù¸§À¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¾ÈÀü¼º Àû¿ë±âÁØÀÌ ¸ðÈ£ÇÏ°í, ½Å¼ÒÀç ¹× ½ÅÁ¦Ç°ÀÇ ÃâÇöÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ½ÉÀÇÀ§¿øȸ ¹× ¹Î¿ø»çÇ×ÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇüÅ·ΠÁõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ Ç¥½Ã°¡ ¸¶Âû µî ¼Õ»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© È®ÀÎÀÇ ¾î·Á¿òÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù´Â ¹®Á¦Á¡ÀÌ Á¦±âµÇ¾î ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõÁ¦µµ Àü¹Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àç°ËÅäÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ´ëµÎµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â °¡¼³±âÀÚÀçÀÇ ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõÁ¦µµÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º È®º¸¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© ±¹³»¿Ü °¡¼³±âÀÚÀç °ü·Ã ±âÁØ, ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ½ÉÀÇ À§¿øȸ ¹× ¹Î¿ø»çÇ×, °¡¼³±âÀÚÀ纰 ÀÎÁõ¸¶Å© Ç¥½Ã ½ÇÅ µîÀÇ Á¶»ç ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ÇöÇà °¡¼³±âÀÚÀç ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ ¹× ÀÚÀ²¾ÈÀüÈ®ÀÎÀÇ ½Å°í Á¦µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹®Á¦Á¡ ¹× °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ» µµÃâÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ±¹³»ÀÇ ±âÁØÀº ÀϺ»°ú À¯»çÇϸç, ¹Ý¸é À¯·´°ú ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Á¦µµ´Â ±ÇÀå»çÇ×À¸·Î¼ °Á¦¼ºÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¸ç, ½Å¼ÒÀç ¹× ½Å¼ÒÀç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àû¿ëÀÌ À¯¿¬ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ½ÉÀÇÀ§¿øȸÀÇ ½ÉÀdz»¿ë ¹× ¹Î¿øÁ¦±â³»¿ëÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇϸç, °è¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡Ãß¼¼¿¡ ÀÖ¾ú°í, Ç¥½Ã¹æ¹ý¿¡¼´Â À½°¢À» ¼±È£ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀϺΠÀμ⸦ ÅëÇÏ¿© Ç¥½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇâÈÄ Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ °¡¼³±âÀÚÀç ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõÁ¦µµÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º Á¤ÂøÀ» À§Çؼ´Â °¡¼³±âÀÚÀç Ç°¸ñÁ¶Á¤À» À§ÇÑ ¹ýÁ¦È ¹× ¿¬°èÈ, ÀÚÀ²Á¡°Ë±âÁØ ¹× ½ÃÇè¹æ¹ý, ¹Ý¿µ±¸ÀûÀÎ ¾ÈÀüÀÎÁõ Ç¥½Ã ¹× À§Ä¡ ÁöÁ¤¹æ¾ÈÀ» µµÃâÇÏ´Â ¿¬±¸°¡ ¼±ÇàµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
This study minimizes the number of items subject to compulsory safety certificate by switching them to autonomous safety confirmation when they have low risks and frequency of application for certificates. It is also intended to add items to compulsory safety certification based on the certification performance, frequency of use, high risks of accidents, and poor management standards. As a result of examining the preceding studies, it was concluded that quantitative assessment criteria are required to discuss the needs to adjust the standards and the level of safety control restrictions. The items of feasibility assessment were derived to reflect the temporary equipment and materials' manufacture, rental, and awareness of users. The objective standards to secure safety were established based on the properties of each item based on the risk assessment using past history of accidents. As a result of reclassification, the items subject to compulsory safety certification were reduced from 33 items of 12 types to 12 items of 4 kinds and the items subject to autonomous safety confirmation were increased from 8 kinds to 16 items of 9 kinds. |