| ³í¹®¸í |
ÃøÁ¤ÁöÇ¥¿¡ µû¸¥ °Ç¼³»ý»ê¼º ºñ±³ / A Comparative Study on Construction Productivity Trends as Analyzed by Various Measures |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ÀÌÄ¡ÁÖ(Lee, Chijoo) ; À̰(Lee, Ghang) ; ¿øÁ¾¼º(Won, Jongsung) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý ±¸Á¶°è, Vol.35 No.04 (2019-04) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(175) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(10) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°Ç¼³³ëµ¿»ý»ê¼º ; Ãþ´ç ¼Ò¿ä°ø»çÀϼö ; ¿¬¸éÀû 1 ; 000m2´ç ¼Ò¿ä°ø»çÀϼö ; construction labor productivity ; construction duration per floor ; construction duration per 1 ; 000m2 gross floor area |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
°Ç¼³»ý»ê¼º Çâ»óÀ» À§Çؼ´Â °Ç¼³»ý»ê¼ºÀÇ °ú°Å¿Í ÇöÀç Ãß¼¼¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.??µû¶ó¼ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â 1995³âºÎÅÍ 2015³â±îÁö Çѱ¹, ¹Ì±¹, ¿µ±¹, ÀϺ»ÀÇ °Ç¼³»ý»ê¼º º¯È ÃßÀ̸¦ ¼¼ °¡Áö ÃøÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®, ºñ±³ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ¼¼°¡Áö ÃøÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀº °Ç¼³³ëµ¿»ý»ê¼º, Ãþ´ç°ø»çÀϼö, ¿¬¸éÀû 1,000m2´ç °ø»çÀϼöÀÌ´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú, 4°³±¹ÀÇ ±¹Á¦ °Ç¼³ °æÀï·ÂÀº ÃøÁ¤ÁöÇ¥¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̰¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ³ëµ¿»ý»ê¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, Çѱ¹ÀÌ µÚ¸¦ À̾ú´Ù. Çѱ¹Àº »ý»ê¼º Áõ°¡À²ÀÌ ÀϺ»¿¡ ÀÌ¾î µÎ¹øÂ°·Î ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¹Ý¸é, °ø»ç±â°£ Ãø¸é¿¡¼´Â ´Ù¸¥ ±¹°¡µé¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© °Ç¼³»ý»ê¼ºÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³·Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
To improve productivity in the architecture, construction and engineering industry, it is critical to understand both current and historic trends in construction productivity. This study analyzes and compares construction productivity trends of South Korea, the U.S., the U.K., and Japan 1995 to 2015 using the following three measures: construction labor productivity, construction duration per floor, and construction duration per 1,000 m2 floor area. As the results, the international competitiveness of each country varied according to which measures were used to analyze them. Among the four countries, the construction labor productivity of the U.S. was the highest, followed by that of South Korea. South Korea also had the second highest productivity growth rate, following that of Japan. On the other hand, when analyzed from the perspective of construction duration, the construction productivity in South Korea appeared relatively lower than those of other countries. There were differences in the location of construction competitiveness of each country analyzed by various measures. Therefore, to accurately diagnose and improve the construction competitiveness in South Korea, strategies based on various measures are need to established simultaneously. |