°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2024³â 6¿ù

³í¹®¸í µé·ÚÁî öÇÐÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇÑ '±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü'¿Í '¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£'°³³äÀÇ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£ÀÇ '°æ°è' Ư¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / Research on the "Boundary" characteristics of community public space based on the concepts of "Body without organs" and "Smooth space" in Deleuze's philosophy
ÀúÀÚ¸í ·ù¼ÝÀÌ ; À±¼ºÈ£
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.19 No.04 (2024-06)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(563) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12)
ISSN 1976-4405
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù °èȹ¹×¼³°è / µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î Áú µé·ÚÁî; ¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£ ÀÌ·Ð; ±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü ÀÌ·Ð; Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ; °ø°ø °ø°£ ; Gilles.Deleuze; Smooth Space Theory; Body Without Organs Theory; Community; Public Space
¿ä¾à1 (¿¬±¸¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû) 21¼¼±â Á߹ݿ¡ Á¢¾îµé¸é¼­ ±¹°¡ÀÇ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ±¹·ÂÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ°í »ýÈ°¼öÁØÀÇ Çâ»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó, µµ½ÃÁö¿ª»çȸÀÇ °ø°ø¼­ºñ½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ¿ä±¸µµ ³¯·Î ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °³ÀÎÈ­ »çȸ, µùÅ©Á· ¼ö Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¸¥ Ãâ»êÀ² ±Þ¶ô°ú Àα¸ °¨¼Ò¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÎÀû ±³·ù °¨¼Ò·Î ÀÎÇÑ »çȸÀû °í¸³°¨ µî ½É¸®Àû ¹®Á¦µµ µ¢´Þ¾Æ ½É°¢ÇØÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áö¿ª»çȸ °ø°ø °ø°£¿¡¼­ µé·ÚÁî öÇÐÀÇ¡®±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü¡¯¿Í¡®¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£¡¯ÀÇ °³³ä¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ °ø°£Àû Ư¡°ú ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ °áÇÕÇÏ¿© ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀ¸·Î »ç·ÊºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ ÀÌµé °ø°£¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â °øÅëÁ¡À» Á¤¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. (¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý) º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¸ÕÀú µé·ÚÁî öÇп¡¼­ ¡®±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü¡¯¿Í¡®¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£¡¯°³³äÀÇ ¼­Àû ¹× ¹®ÇåºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÀÛÀ¸·Î Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£ °ü·Ã ³í¹® ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£ÀÇ À¯Çü ¹× Ư¼ºÀ» µµÃâÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, µÎ ÀÌ·ÐÀ» Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£ ¼³°èÀÇ ±âÃÊ·Î Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£°ú À§ÀÇ µÎ °³³äÀÇ »óÈ£°ü°è¸ðÇüÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ°í, À̸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© Çö´ëÀÎÀÇ ¿ä±¸¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£ÀÇ ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò¸¦ Ãß°¡·Î Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò¿Í ÀÌ·ÐÀû °³³äÀ» °áÇÕÇÏ¿© ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ »ç·Ê¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ´Ù. (°á°ú) µé·ÚÁîÀÇ Ã¶ÇÐ À̷п¡¼­ Ãâ¹ßÇÏ¿© Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£°ú¡®±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü¡¯¿Í¡®¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£¡¯ÀÇ °³³äÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ°í Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£ÀÇ 10°¡Áö Ư¼ºÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÑ´Ù. À§ÀÇ ÀÌ·ÐÀ» Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿©¡®±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü¡¯¿Í¡®¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£¡¯À̶ó´Â °³³äÇÏ¿¡ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ °ø°ø °ø°£ÀÇ 5°¡Áö °ø°£ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î¡®Á¦4°ø°£¡¯¿¡¼­¡®°æ°è¡¯Æ¯¼º°ú Ç¥Çö Ư¼ºÀ» ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ »ç·Ê¿Í ¾Õ¼­ Á¦½ÃÇÑ »ç·Ê¸¦ °áÇÕÇÏ¿© µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù. (°á·Ð) Áö¿ª»çȸ °ø°ø °ø°£Àº¡®±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü¡¯¿Í¡®¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£¡¯À̶ó´Â °³³ä°úÀÇ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ëÀ¸·Î ´õ ¸¹Àº °ø°£Àû °¡´É¼ºÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³ÂÀ¸¸ç, ÇâÈÄ Áö¿ª»çȸ °ø°ø °ø°£ÀÌ ¹ßÀüÇÏ´Â ¹æÇâÀ» öÇÐÀû, Çö½ÇÀûÀÎ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ °í¹ÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â °øµ¿Ã¼ °ø°ø °ø°£¿¡¼­ ¡®¸Å²öÇÑ °ø°£¡¯°³³ä¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç°í¸¦ ÅëÇØ °øµ¿Ã¼ °ø°ø °ø°£ÀÌ Àΰ£°ü°è ¹ßÀüÀ» À§ÇÑ Çٽɰø°£ÀÎ 'Á¦4ÀÇ °ø°£'ÀÓÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ°í,¡®±â°ü ¾ø´Â ¸öü¡¯°³³äÀ» ÅëÇØ Àΰ£ÀÇ Ã¼Ç輺À» °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÁøÁ¤À¸·Î Àΰ£ °£ °Å¸®¸¦ Á¼È÷´Â È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀÓÀ» °­Á¶ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °ø°£Àû/½É¸®Àû 2´Ü°è¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿¬±¸´Â ¹Ì·¡ÀÇ Áö¿ª»çȸ °ø°ø °ø°£¿¡¼­ üÇèÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â °ø°£°³³äÀÇ ±âÃÊ°¡ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 (Background and Purpose) In the mid-20th century, the comprehensive national strength of the country is gradually improving, and people are increasingly demanding improvements in their living standards. Moreover, people's demands for urban community public services are acquiring significance. However, as this is a personalized society, there has been a sharp decline in fertility rates due to the increase in the number of DINK (dual income, no kids) families. Furthermore, increasingly severe psychological issues, such as social isolation due to the decrease in interpersonal communication because of population decline, are on the rise. This study attempts to adopt the concepts of "Body Without Organs" and "Smooth space" in Deleuze's philosophy, combined with specific spatial characteristics and elements in community public spaces that conform to Deleuze's philosophy, and summarizes the commonalities in these spaces through case analysis. (Method) First, this study conducts a book and literature analysis regarding the concepts of "Body Without Organs" and "Smooth space" in Deleuze's philosophy. Next, by analyzing relevant studies on community public spaces, the types and characteristics of community public spaces are identified. The two theories serve as the basis for community public space design, and a relationship model between community public spaces and the above two concepts is proposed. Based on the analysis of the relationship model, the constituent elements of community public spaces that meet the demands of a modern society are proposed. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of specific cases is conducted based on the constituent elements and theoretical concepts. (Results) Beginning with Deleuze's philosophical theory, this study analyzes community public spaces and the concepts of "Body Without Organs" and "Smooth space." A total of 10 characteristics of community public spaces are proposed. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the above theories, five spatial elements of community public spaces are presented under the guidance of the concepts of "Body Without Organs" and "Smooth space." Finally, by combining specific cases and previous findings, the characteristics of boundaries and their manifestation in the "Fourth space" are identified. (Conclusions) The interaction among community public spaces and the concepts of "Body Without Organs" and "Smooth space" has created greater spatial possibilities. The future development direction of community public spaces has been considered from philosophical as well as practical perspectives. This study emphasizes that in community public spaces, the concept of "Smooth space" has been considered to determine that community public spaces are key to promoting human relationship development?the "Fourth space," and emphasizing human experience through the concept of "Body Without Organs" is an effective method to bring people closer. This research, which commences from the spatial/psychological level, could serve as the foundation for the experiential spatial concept in future community public spaces.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
DOI http://10.35216/kisd.2024.19.4.563