³í¹®¸í |
ºê·çÅ»¸®Áò °üÁ¡À¸·Î º» Çö´ë ±âµ¶±³ °ø°£ÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Brutalist Study on the Characteristics of Contemporary Christian Spaces |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹¹®È°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Åë±Ç Á¦87È£ (2024-08) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(125) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(8) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ºê·çÅ»¸®Áò; ±âµ¶±³ °ø°£; Ç¥Çö°³³ä; ÇüÅÂ; ºû ; Brutalism; Christian Space; Expression Concept; Form; Light |
¿ä¾à2 |
The contemporary age is witnessing debates over whether to preserve Brutalist buildings, which were created forideology and popularization, as cultural heritage or to present them as opportunities for new generations to create newlyconceptualized buildings. The purpose of this study is to analyze the cases of contemporary Christian spaces through thestylistic concept and characteristics of Brutalism, thus exploring the fundamentals and features of diversifying architectural styles. Building on precedent research on the periodic changes in Brutalist architecture in terms of expressions and forms, this studyidentifies Brutalist characteristics within Christian spaces and explains them using representative buildings as examples. Introducing European and Asian sacred buildings constructed since the 2010, it intends to analyze the basic concept andcharacteristics of each building in terms of Brutalism. These sacred spaces, rooted in material authenticity, imply a sense of rawstrength unique to Brutalism, which is further intensified by associations with the uncanny, the mystery out of the everyday, orthe emotion of overwhelming fascination. The exposed structures are found to have inherited the original ethos of Brutalism. The forms can be seen as the outcomes of architects¡¯ experimental studies, taking various shapes escaping from conventionalnotions. The effects of spatial change through light focus not only on symbols, centers, and directions, but also on highlightingmateriality through direct lighting on objects and invoking remarkably uncanny expressions through indirect lighting. |