°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

Çѱ¹ÁöÁø°øÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2025³â 3¿ù

³í¹®¸í ÁöÁøÃë¾à »ó¼¼¸¦ °¡Áø ö±ÙÄÜÅ©¸®Æ® Çб³ °ÇÃ๰ÀÇ Á¤Àû ¹Ýº¹°¡·Â ½ÇÇè ¿¬±¸ / An Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete School Frame Structure with Seismically-Deficient Details Under Static Cyclic Loading
ÀúÀÚ¸í °­µ¿¿Ï(Kang, Dongwan) ; ȲÈñÁø(Hwang, Heejin) ; ½Å½ÂÈÆ(Shin, Seunghun) ; ÃÖÀμ·(Choi, Insub) ; ½ÅÁö¿í(Shin, Jiuk)
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹ÁöÁø°øÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× Çѱ¹ÁöÁø°øÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.29 No.2(Åë±Ç 164È£) (2025-03)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(135) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(7)
ISSN 1226-525X
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù ±¸Á¶
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ; Seismically-vulnerable RC school building; Lateral resistance capacity; Cyclic loading test
¿ä¾à2 Most reinforced concrete (RC) school buildings constructed in the 1980s have seismic vulnerabilities due to low transverse reinforcement ratios in columns and beam-column joints. In addition, the building structures designed for only gravity loads have the weak-columnstrong- beam (WCSB) system, resulting in low lateral resistance capacity. This study aims to investigate the lateral resistance capacities of a two-story, full-scale school building specimen through cyclic loading tests. Based on the experimental responses, load-displacement hysteresis behavior and story drift-strain relationship were mainly investigated by comparing the responses to code-defined story drift limits.
The test specimen experienced stress concentration at the bottom of the first story columns and shear failure at the beam-column joints with strength degradation and bond failure observed at the life safety level specified in the code-defined drift limits for RC moment frames with seismic details. This indicates that the seismically vulnerable school building test specimen does not meet the minimum performance requirements under a 1,400-year return period earthquake, suggesting that seismic retrofitting is necessary.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹ÁöÁø°øÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
DOI https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2025.29.2.135